Page
created July 31, 2011
Sitting date: September 22, 2010
|
|
|
| I've
got to admit that the idea of photo sittings on two
consecutive days to be a little daunting. It
requires that I come up with triple the number of
ideas. But I'm beginning to feel that
"daunting" is good for an artist. I have
a tendency to stay "safe", meaning that I
often return to concepts & setups that were
successful in the past. But if I'm going to dive
into the deep end of two days of photo sessions, there's
going to be some setups that are new.
This
is my guest room on the top floor. I had the idea
of putting the strobe heads on the floor & pointing
them up so that the light bounced off of the light
walls, especially the slanty part under the roof
line. And there she is -- Natalia naked on the
best, looking so natural, so comfortable, and so
intimate. Somehow, Natalia seems more nude than
nude here. |
|
|
Earlier,
in the Day One commentary, I think I decided not to mix
color & B&W images on a page. Here, I
already break that resolution. Well, okay -- it
takes a while to get started with a new setup, and
converting to B&W is an extra step, so I usually
start with color. But I think this page will be
B&W.
I was
in awe of Natailia when I first met her. I can't
help but compare "her-then" to
"her-now", and I think Natalia is much more
sensuous now. As much as I liked looking at her
then; I enjoy looking at her much more now. |
| I
posted one of these images on one of my on-line
profiles, and a viewer commented that he liked the
natural lighting of these image. There is nothing
natural about this lighting -- these images were lit by
three separate strobes.
Still
it is a nice effect, especially on a model with such
natural beauty. |
|
|
|
Think
about it -- this setup is awfully constraining for a
model. There's not a whole lot of space. But
the amazing Natalia finds ways to move within those
constraints. |
|
|
| I've
talked about the great "chemistry" I feel with
Natalia, and I think there are many images made on this
second day that shows our "chemistry" -- this
is an example of those images. I look at images
like this & I see the relationship I share with the
model. I wonder: can people who don't know
either one of us see the chemistry? |
| One
of the on-line portfolio web sites keeps sending me an
e-mail advertising a "Shoot The Centerfold
Experience" workshop, and there are three pictures
of head-and-chest shots of three Playboy
centerfolds. All are pretty, blonde, with squeezed
together breasts and big, big smiles. They all
look alike! Sure, they are pretty, but their
beauty conforms to a pre-defined definition of
"beauty".
Maybe
that form of "beauty" is widely accepted, but
it's not universally accepted. It seems plastic.
Want
to know what I think is "beauty"? You
need look no further than Natalia. She's all
natural, graceful, and comfortable. She has very
strong hands (you are looking at her hands, aren't
you?). When I first met her, I thought she might
be a potter. |
|
|
|
Here's
a wide shot; it shows off the unusual configuration of
the guest room, and it gives a good hint about the
placement of the lights. (You can also see the
attic access and the speaker for the whole house audio).
I do
like these wide shots. I think photographers
should examine their own photographs & articulate
their tendencies. For example, I tend to crop
images so that the model's figure fills nearly the
entire image dimensions. Yet, I like these images,
where the figure is a small fraction of the image
space. It's good to embrace these off-center
compositions, if only to give the eye some exercise.
Bonus:
I think Natalia's figure looks fantastic in this
image. |
| I'm
a big, big fan of eye-contact, because eye-contact
implies intimacy. Or, at the other extreme, I
dislike so-called "candid" images, because
there is no risk to the photographer -- without
interaction, the photographer is just a voyeur. I
also dislike the "model staring wistfully out the
window" images. I always wonder what she's
looking at and why is she ignoring the photographer.
But
"eye-contact" is a guideline, not a rule.
Here, Natalia is glancing at the main light
source. Somehow, I don't mind the lack of
eye-contact. |
|
|
|
| It's
real uncomfortable making this image and the ones that
follow. I'm above Natalia, leaning over her, and
holding the camera above her. You can't tell, but
the lens is set at a wide angle setting, so I'm pretty
close. There is a real danger of me falling on top
of Natalia or of me dropping the camera onto her, and I
am kinda invading Natalia's personal space, but she is
trusting (or maybe she's unaware of how precarious her
position is). But I like the weightless feeling of
these "camera pointing down" images. |
|
|
| Natalia
identified this image as one of her favorites, and I
agree. |
|
|
| I
don't remember whether I've ever worked in this part of
the house before, but regardless, I had a good time with
Natalia up here. Normally, I would be
uncomfortable photographing a model on a bed, but we
managed to have fun. As much as I enjoyed the
previous day, when Natalia & I reconnected, I do
believe that I'm enjoying Day Two's photography a lot
more. |
Under
The Skylight
|
(Remember -- feedback is always appreciated)
| All
images (c) 2011 Looknsee Photography |
|
|
|