Page created April 30, 2007
Sitting date:  March 19, 2007

  

We change the lights around a bit, and right of the back, we make one of my favorite images from this sitting.  

jl013d_0096sepbig.jpg

 

jl013d_0100sepbig.jpg

Okay, sitting here drafting this commentary makes me think.  I really like this dual side lighting setup -- it provides a nice sculptural quality to the figure.  But it's one of those lighting schemes that might be nice for the figure but not so nice for the face.  Here, it's kinda nice to see just the barest hint of Jolie's face.  

So, I'm conflicted -- I really like eye contact with the camera, but with this light, eye contact means that the face is in shadow.  This light would work well if the model would turn her head & face one of the light sources, but while that would be nice light on her face, it would also mean that we'd be producing an image where the model is looking out of the picture frame.  I don't like those pictures.  I always wonder what the model is looking at.

So, we'll make a few images this way, but I suspect that we won't stick with it for long. 

 

jl013d_0103sepbig.jpg

jl013d_0105sepbig.jpg

 

jl013d_0120seph.jpg

Okay, we abandon the dual side lighting setup.  I pull over the big comfy chair & set up one main light suspended on a boom over the camera position & another light behind the chair, creating that halo effect.  This works well for us.

 

This works well for us, better than the dual side lighting setup.

I suspect that over time, I can refine this further.  I haven't decided yet how to modify the main light.  Here, there's a 16 inch reflector plus a diffuser; given the distance between the light & the model, the light is fairly harsh.  We can experiment in future sittings with using a softer or harder light source and with moving the light closer or further away or higher.  

jl013d_0122sepbig.jpg

 

jl013d_0123sepbig.jpg

 

jl013d_0133seph.jpg

I've got a few posing taboos.  One of these is that I don't like it when a model points a limb directly towards the camera -- such a pose makes the limb look short & stubby.  This setup, with the chair & ottoman perpendicular to the camera axis, encourages the model to point her legs towards the camera.  Jolie & I work to find positions that don't foreshorten her legs.

 

jl013d_0136seph.jpg

See?  Her thighs look long & yummy, but her shins look too short for her thighs.  It's an easy fix.

 

jl013d_0138seph.jpg

Well, here's a solution.  Jolie is marvelously uninhibited.  Some models would be uncomfortable with a legs askance pose, but careful lighting & camera angle can prevent the pose from being too revealing.  

 

jl013d_0142sepbig.jpg

jl013d_0143sepbig.jpg

 

jl013d_0147seph.jpg

 

jl013d_0150seph.jpg

Here's a favorite.  The pose avoids the limb-towards-camera problem.  Jolie has a wonderfully erotic look on her face.

 

jl013d_0162sepbig.jpg

At the moment, and now here weeks afterward, I enjoy this light.  For me, studio photography starts with the lighting concept.  A lot of this is purposely counter to my trends -- I tend to use very soft light, but here, the light is harder than I normally use.

Also, I tend to keep my distance from the model, including nearly all of her figure in the image.  Here, I slap on the telephoto lens & get "closer".  Sure, Jolie has lots of physical charms, but she has an exceptional & expressive face.  I like taking a closer look.

It's a good idea to break your photographic habits once in a while.  Sometimes, all you need to do is think about doing the opposite of what you usually do.

 

jl013d_0163sepbig.jpg

 

jl013d_0168sepbig.jpg

jl013d_0169sepbig.jpg

 

Clearly, I'm enjoying all this:  Jolie, this lighting, the telephoto lens, etc.

One observation:  when I was working in film, I restricted myself to about 100 exposures per three-hour sitting.  That was because I could develop 100 exposures in one batch, and it kept expenses in check.  (Think about it:  a 100 exposure sitting costs maybe $30-40 in film, $70+ in photographic paper, and four days in the darkroom.

(Now, I haven't switched to digital because it's cheaper -- I've switched because I needed the focus assist & because I didn't have the time to spend in the darkroom).

Nowadays, I make maybe 300+ exposures in that three hour sitting, using the digital camera.   Sometimes, I think that's too much.  I should be more selective of the exposures I make.  Why?  Because when I make so many exposures, I'm feeling like I am just in the vicinity of a good image & hope that I'll catch one.  Instead, I should be in control, creating that good image, instead of just hoping that one of the many exposures is good.

This is worthy of more thought.

(I say this besides one of my favorite images from this sitting).

jl013d_0178sepbig.jpg

 

jl013d_0183seph.jpg

 

jl013d_0184sepbig.jpg

I asked Jolie to show me a messy-hair pose.  She looks darn sexy with messy hair.

 

jl013d_0187sepbig.jpg

 

jl013d_0190seph.jpg

I encourage Jolie to move all over the chair.  I particularly like the poses where she's leaning forward towards the camera.

 

jl013d_0191sepbig.jpg

 

 

First sittings with new-to-me models are always a challenge.  This one had an additional complication -- a new camera.  So, I prepare.  I like to think of about 4 or 5 different concepts, with the understanding that I'll implement the 3 or so that make the most sense.  An advantage is that it simplifies the sitting, and I have the opportunity to tell the model about the concepts before the sitting, so that she can be prepared.

So, with a curvy model like Jolie, I had in mind to try some images with her lit from above.  We try that.

This sitting concludes with Lit From Above

 

(Remember -- feedback is always appreciated) 

All images (c) 2007 Looknsee Photography

Jolie #1 Out Takes

Nearly 90 more images from this sitting are available in the Out Takes Galleries, which are available to those who have made a donation to the upkeep of this web site.  See this FAQ question for more details.

Hit Counter